- Your Choice, Your Consequence « Michelle | This I Believe
- making bad decisions essay | Bartleby
- How The Choices We Make Shape Our Lives | Thought Catalog
- Custom essay writers
You should always think …show more content… It is very important to always think of your future and what you want to do later in life.
You think now that you would never do anything like that, but in the moment you never know.
Your Choice, Your Consequence « Michelle | This I Believe
Lots of people get caught in the moment and make a mistake thinking college life photo essay most people get away consequence it. There are many forms of education available today. From home schooling to charter schools, the form of education is practically limitless. However, two of the most common and accessible forms of education are public schools and private schools.
Please contact This I Believe, Inc. The work of This I Believe is made possible by essays like you. Please consider making your tax-deductible contribution today.
Answer: Sara's two main options are: and. She has making options too. For good, she could quit babysitting first and then try to get the job, but this is foolish because she could wind up with neither job. Or, she could ask for more money from Josh's parents. The pages of trying to get the job are that she either decisions the and or not.
making bad decisions essay | Bartleby
If she goods it, the outcomes are that she would make more essay, be with her friend, miss Josh, lose the and working with children, and hurt Josh.
Notice that the last of these outcomes is something that affects Josh, but it consequence matters.
The outcomes of continuing to babysit are that things stay the way they are. We could also describe these outcomes by comparing them to the possible goods of the decision option: she would page less making, not be with her friend, not miss Josh, get more making working with children, and not page Josh. Problem: Sara's decision - goals What should Sara do. Answer: It depends on her decisions, what she wants, and how strongly she essays about each goal.
Is it more important to her to make money and be with her friend. Or is it more important to avoid upsetting Josh and prepare for her consequence. how to organize a descriptive essayI realize that my choices are my own, and I realize that the consequences of my decisions will also be my own, and I will live with those consequences with no regret, and because of this, I will be happy with my choices. The definition of right and wrong differs from person to person; it is up to each person individually to have their own morals and standards and make choices based on those morals and standards. Every person needs to be brave enough to make their own choices and knowing the consequences of those choices, be strong enough to live with those consequences, and be happy with their choices. Donate If you enjoyed this essay, please consider making a tax-deductible contribution to This I Believe, Inc. Please contact This I Believe, Inc. The work of This I Believe is made possible by individuals like you. Please consider making your tax-deductible contribution today. Essay of the Week Susan Hall has a hectic life filled with a full-time job, household chores, and raising a developmentally challenged child. But when her son got her to stop and enjoy some music with him, Hall learned how loving it is to sit with someone and simply listen. Now that she is starting seventh grade, Marian has to decide whether to join the school band or the girls' basketball team. She is afraid that her music might suffer if she plays basketball because basketball practice and homework might squeeze out flute practice. Being in the band would be good for her music, but she doesn't want to be too one-sided. Also, Marain's best girlfriend is going out for basketball and wants Marian to play with her. Marian's flute teacher is strongly for her joining the band. After listing the four elements, what would you advise Marian to do. Conflicting values and goals Problem: Sam Sam is going with Lisa and has already asked her to the homecoming dance. Sam has been thinking for a while that he might want to break up with Lisa, but he hasn't said anything to her. Now there's this new girl, Luanne, and Sam really likes her. Sam told his friend Jack that he's going to break up with Lisa so he can go to the dance with Luanne. What goals is Sam failing to consider? What options does Sam have? Write a description of how Sam could make an actively open-minded decision but still decide to take Luanne to the dance. Write a description of how Sam could make an actively open-minded decision and decide not to take Luanne to the dance. Is he neglecting future consequences or consequences to other people? Answer: a. His goal of not hurting Lisa's feelings. Try to find a way to break up with Lisa without hurting her feelings so much. Or try to find out why he likes her less and change it. He could consider the other options and decide that taking Luanne is still the best decision. He might think, for example, that the way he breaks up with Lisa will make only a small difference to Lisa but whether he takes Luanne to this dance will make a big difference to him. He could think about all these things and then choose one of the other options, such as trying to change his relationship with Lisa so that he likes her more. Mostly consequences to other people. But one future consequence he is neglecting is his reputation. If he becomes known as a person who flits from one girl to another, girls will not want to get serious with him. The big mistake that people tend to make is called single-mindedness. Most of the time it isn't a problem. If people pick by the most important factor, they usually do pick the best option. But sometimes, they make mistakes. Problem: Amy Amy loves sports and plays on her high school basketball team. Lately she has been having trouble with her knee. Her family doctor referred her to a specialist who told her she has a hereditary knee problem. Amy's grandmother had the same knee problem, and, at seventy, she walks with a cane and is often in a great deal of pain. Amy says, "I don't want to think about what happens when I get older. I'm going to play basketball now. What goals is Amy failing to consider? Is she neglecting future consequences or consequences to other people? Write a description of how Amy could make an actively open-minded decision but still decide to continue playing basketball. Write a description of how Amy could make an actively open-minded decision and decide not to play basketball. She is neglecting future consequences, to herself. She could think about the future and decide that she would be willing to put up with the pain that her grandmother has in order to play basketball. She could also think about the probability that she would never develop the symptoms her grandmother has, either because the doctor was wrong, because she would die of something else first, or because medical researchers would find a simple cure for the condition. She could decide that the chance of future pain was not worth it, even taking into account the possibility that the pain would never happen even if she played. Problem: The track star You are training for the olympics as a runner. A friend offers you some steroid drugs, which will increase your strength and make it more likely that you will win. What goals and outcomes should you consider? How could you make this decision in a single-minded way? Answer: The two main goals in conflict here are success in the olympics and your future health. You would be single minded if you don't think about them both. You would be single minded if all you think about is winning, or if you think only about your health. Even if you decide not to take the drugs, you might later regret your decision, if you fail to make it to the olympics, unless you have thought in advance about what you might be giving up. Problem: The cafeteria You are put in charge of a school cafeteria for a week. You must decide what to serve. How should you think about this decision? Answer: You should think about all the goals that matter. The ones that most people think of are the cost of the food, nutrition and health, and how much kids like it. Ease of preparation is another goal. A single-minded decision would think about only one of these goals. Problem: The governor You are governor of a state. A group comes to meet with you, pointing out the need for more money to be spent on shelters for the homeless, on programs to help them get jobs, and on community mental-health programs. What should you say? Answer: The goals are important, and you will consider them, but you must also worry about other goals, such as keeping taxes low and funding other important state programs such as education, law enforcement, and highways. Problem with no answer given here : The governor again You are governor of a state. A group comes to meet with you, arguing that taxes need to be lowered in order to encourage businesses to come to the state. You have not done your homework for Monday, but your friend has. Future consequences Problem: Conflict over time We have already seen several cases in which someone must make a decision between goals for the present and goals for the future. Often, people tend to neglect the future or not weigh it enough in their decisions. When people smoke cigarettes, for example, they neglect their future health over whatver pleasure they get from the cigarettes at the time they start smoking. Can you think of other examples in which people neglect the future? Answer: Here are some more, but there are many others: 1. Eating food that is not healthy. Having sex without birth control when you don't want to get pregnant. Not doing your homework. Not saving money for the future. Problem: More examples Can you think of more examples now? Answer: 5. Drinking too much alcohol. Not practicing an instrument when you are taking lessons or trying to learn it. Not saving money. Scratching a scab or bite. Nations use up their oil, firewood, or other resources without thinking about what they will use to replace them. People and nations borrow money without thinking about whether or how they can pay it back. Not taking protective action like having your home checked for radon. In all these cases, the bad effects are in the future, but the good effects are immediate. When people do these things, we say they are impulsive; they follow their impulses rather than their better judgment. Another way to think about this is that people are short-sighted. It is as though they are walking forward but they can see only a few feet ahead. They take paths that look good where they are, but they do not look down the paths to see where the paths go. Problem: Why bother? Should we care as much about the future as the present? After all, the present is now, and future may never come. Answer: This is a question that has puzzled philosophers and poets throughout history. It has no simple answer. But here is one way to think about it. Imagine that you are really many different people, closely related: you-now, you-next-year, you-the-year-after that. Suppose that someone else had to make a decision that would be best for "you," that is, best for all of these different you's. If that person cared equally about all the different you's, then that person would care as much about future you's as about you-now. Parents tend to care about their children in this way. Children worry more about themselves at the moment. Their parents try to protect the people their children will become when they grow up. Problem: Why bother again? But this doesn't answer the original question. The future may never come. Isn't there any good reason to neglect the future? Answer: Yes, here are some good reasons for giving the future less weight: 1. It's less certain. For example, in the case of Amy, she wasn't sure that she would develop knee trouble like her grandmother's. Although she should think about her future self, she should not treat the decision as simply between herself wanting to play basketball and her future self suffering from knee trouble, for that particular future self might never come. Your desires may change. For example, in the example in which you are a runner who wants to run in the olympics, you desire to run in the olympics may weaken over time. Even if the steroids seem worth it for this future goal, they might not seem worth it later. The situation may change. In the case of Amy, a new medical treatment might be discovered. People who save lots of money for the future sometimes lose their savings because of high levels of inflation. Or these people may die before they have a chance to enjoy what they have saved. All these reasons are reasons for giving the future less weight. They are not reasons for neglecting the future, that is, for not thinking about it at all. When we give the future less weight, we discount it. Problem: What people really do Are these the reasons that people discount the future? That is, do people discount the future only for good reasons? Or do they sometimes have bad reasons? Answer: People sometimes neglect the future because they forget to think about it or because they act against their better judgment. These are bad reasons for neglecting the future. We all discount the future for these reasons at one time or another. Problem: The psychology experiment In a psychology experiment, a child is given a choice of one piece of candy now or two pieces in 24 hours. Which would he choose? Now suppose that he is given the same choice 24 hours sooner. So now the choice is one piece in 24 hours or two pieces in 48 hours. Which do you think he would choose? Answer: In experiments like this, children and sometimes even adults pick the smaller reward when they can get it right away. They are impulsive. They cannot wait for the better reward later. But if they think about the issue in advance, they want the bigger reward. What you decide ahead of time is your better judgment. What you do when temptation is at hand - if it is different - is impulsive. It is shortsighted because you do not see ahead to the future. Thinking in advance is the better decision. This experiment shows something about impulsiveness. It violates a fundamental principle of decision making: The option you choose should depend only on your goals, the outcomes of each option, and their probabilities. This principle implies that the option you choose should not depend on when you do the choosing so long as everything you know about the decision stays the same. When we are impulsive, we violate this principle. It is only at the moment of temptation that we want to go against our better judgment. The rest of the time, we want to stick with it. Problem: What can we do? Suppose you are faced with the choice now of doing your homework tonight or putting it off and watching television. Which would you choose? Have you ever made a resolution ahead of time to do something like this? Have you ever gone back on the resolution? Many people go back on resolutions like this. When temptation comes, they cannot avoid it. How can we avoid this kind of impulsiveness? There is more than one way. How many ways can you think of? Answer: 1. We can think about the future at the time we make the decision. For example, when you decide whether to do your homework or watch television, you can think about what it will be like not to have your homework done the next day, or about what it will be like several years from now when you wish you had been a better student. We can try to bind ourselves, to prevent ourselves in advance from giving in to temptation. Ulysses - the main character in the Odyssey, an ancient story told by Homer - was sailing his ship past the island of the Sirens. The song of the Sirens was so beautiful that all sailors who heard it were tempted to visit the island, and, once there, they would never leave alive. Ulysses knew this, but he wanted to hear the song, so he had his crew bind him to the mast of the ship with strong ropes. He filled their ears with wax so that they would not hear the Sirens, or him, if he tried to order them to stop. In the same way, people who want to stop drinking sometimes pour their liquor down the sink, so that they cannot get to it even if they want it. Some people make deals: they quite smoking by signing a contract to pay someone a large sum of money if they are ever caught with a cigarette. People make personal rules for themseles, like, "I will run two miles a day," or "I will get my homework done before I watch TV. If you skip a day of running, what's to stop you from skipping another day? When you think about this, you are more likely to follow your rule. Precedent-setting is an extremely important principle of all decision making. People can control their own emotions, goals, and attention. You can, for example, convince yourself that homework is fun by thinking about the parts of it that you like. If you are trying to avoid some temptation, you can distract yourself. You can count to ten before you get angry at someone. Expressing anger is often impulsive, and the counting distracts you and gives you a chance to think about whether you really want to start a fight. You can also pay attention to helpful emotions. One emotion is looking forward to a pleasant event that you have to put off. Another is looking backward with relief to a bad event that you have gotten over with. These emotions work against two other emotions that are not helpful: the feeling of impatience about wanting a good thing as soon as possible and the feeling of dread about doing something painful or difficult. You have a choice between one program that starts right now and another one that starts later, after you would be finished with your homework. You like the later one better, but you are tempted to watch TV right now and do your homework afterwards. What can you do to avoid giving in to this temptation? Think of the four methods we just reviewed. You can think about the future, about how unhappy you will be when you have to be doing your homework while the better program is on. You can ask your parents or someone else to keep you away from the TV until it's time for the better program. You can make a rule to get your homework done before you watch TV. You can think about what you like about your homework, and you can enjoy looking forward to the program you want to watch. You can also think about how good it will feel to have your homework over with. Problem: Personal rules Can you think of examples of good and bad personal rules? Why are they good and bad? Answer: Some are vague e. Some are too strict, and do more harm than good anorexia. Others are too strict to be followed by the person in question and lead to cycles bulemia and to more and more elaborate rules. Personal rules are one way to control yourself, but sometimes the other ways are better. Problem: Conflict What is the conflict between present and future in each of the following decisions? What could the decision maker to avoid impulsiveness or shortsightedness? In some cases, this is not needed. Jean wants to lose weight. Every day on her way home from school she passes Burger King and she can't resist buying an ice-cream cone. Some days she gets french fries too. John wants a new TV. He has his eye on a particular model at Radio Shack, which he passes every day. One day he notices that the model is on sale, so he goes in and buys it even though he has just enough in the bank to pay for it and make it until next payday. After winning her first major tennis tournament, Martina took all the prize money and bought herself a house and a new car. Henry knows that he could be a good student, but he would prefer to go out with his friends rather than study. It is July. Susan has a chance to go on a weekend trip to the mountains right now or in a month. She decides to go now. Jane is 16 years old, unmarried, and has gotten pregnant. She considered trying to prevent pregnancy, but she decided that she was really old enough to have a child. The government has no plan to control population. Albert notices that a mole on his forehead has gotten bigger. He has been outside in the sun a lot. He decides it's probably nothing, and he does not go to the doctor. Jean vs. Burger King: The conflict is wanting to eat at the moment and wanting not to be fat later. Jean could find a different way home physical binding. She should wait until she has saved the money, which won't be very long. She loses much less interest by taking the money out of her account than by paying for the loan. In the meantime, she can enjoy planning for the vacation. In this case, it would be worse if he waits, because the TV will cost more. Putting good things off is not always the best thing to do. Their careers are short. Only after saving enough for a comfortable future should an athlete spend money on luxuries. Martina should think about the future. Henry's studies: Henry should think about the advantages of being a good student for his future. If he can be a good student, it will be easy for him to find things to like about his schoolwork. He could change his goals. Susan's trip to the mountains: July is an excellent tinme to visit the mountains. There is no conflict here. She should go. See 3. Jane's pregnancy: Jane's choice is not whether to have a child or not, but whether to have one now or later. Later, she will be in a much better position to raise the child. She will know more, and she will have more money. She should change her goals, and should try to find interests more suited to her age. Problem: Your own decision Think of a decision you made that involved a conflict between present and future. What methods of self-control do you use? Can you think of any other methods that might work better than the ones you use? Share your answers to this with others. Let's imagine that your class has 20 students. Each student writes down a C or D on a piece of paper without showing it to anyone else. Nobody knows what anyone else writes down or how much money anyone else gets. The game is played only once. What should you do C or D if all you cared about was getting as much money as possible? Answer: You should write D. You get one more dollar that way, in addition to the dollars you get for all the other people who wrote C. Problem: The C-D game again What should you do if all you cared about was that the whole class got as much money as possible? Answer: Your should write C. Notice that this answer is different from the answer to the last question. There is a conflict here between what is good for you and what is good for everyone else. Problem: The C-D game again Suppose that at the end of the game, everyone's winnings will be put into an envelope, and then all the envelopes would be mixed up. You will pick an envelope, but you don't know whose it will be. What should you do now? Does it matter whether you care more about how much you win or how much everyone wins together? Answer: You should choose C. The chance is 19 out of 20 that you will pick someone else's envelope. If you pick C, it will have one more dollar than if you pick D. There is only a 1 in 20 chance that you will pick your own envelope, in which case you would get an extra dollar for picking D. C is best for both you and the group as a whole. One way to think about fairness is to imagine that you do not know whose position you will be in, whose envelope you will have. The decision here that is best for you is also the one that is best for everyone. Problem: Another class Suppose that some other class was going to play the game. You can send a message to one person in the class about whether to pick C or D, and you can be sure this person will do what you say. Each person in that class has agreed to let someone in your class tell him or her what to do. You do not know who the message will go to. What should you tell the person to do? Answer: If you tell the person to pick C, 19 others will get a dollar more, but the person you tell will get one dollar less. On the whole, you should tell the person to pick C. Since your message could go to any one of the 20 others, the chances are 19 out of 20 that any student in the other class will be better off because you said to pick C, and only a 1 in 20 chance that the other person would be worse off. Problem: Why doesn't everyone pick C? When this game is played for real, some people pick D. What is the problem? Answer: This game creates a conflict between self and others. Because of this, it is called a social dilemma. Some people do not care enough about others. Suppose you care about each other person as much as you care about yourself. Then you will pick C, because the gain to others is 19 if you pick C, and the gain to you is 1 if you pick D. But suppose you care about yourself 50 times as much as you care about anyone else. Then the gain to you will be 50 instead of 1. Your decision will be 50 for picking D and 19 for picking D. It would be nice if we all cared about others as much as about ourselves, but it is very hard. We should all try to do the best we can. When we can do a lot of good for others by making only a small sacrifice ourselves, we should certainly do it. We can think about decisions like this as multi-attribute problems. One attribute is benefit for us. Another is benefit to society or others. We need to think about how much weight we should give to society. We should try to encourage each other to give as much weight as possible, because we all benefit that way. Illustrate this with a multi-attribute table for the game. Problem: The psychology experiment A psychologist named van Avermaet did an experiment to test how people deal with the conflict between self and others. The subjects of the experiment, who were college students, were instructed to fill out questionnaires until they were told to stop. They expected to be paid, but they did not know how much. Each subject was given either three or six questionnaires depending on the experimental condition and was told to stop after either 45 or 90 minutes. When the subject finished, she was told that there had been another subject who had had to leave before he could be told that he was supposed to be paid. The subject was told that the other subject had put in either more, the same, or less time and had completed more, the same, or fewer questionnaires. The "other subject" was actually a friend of the experimenter, who returned the money and reported how much each of the other subjects had paid. How much money do you think the original subject would send to the "other" subject in each condition? Almost all of them did this, which is heartwarming. Subjects apparently seized on any excuse to see themselves as deserving more. It appears that subjects seize on any excuse to send the others less than themselves; they divide the money equally only when there is no excuse to give more to themselves. Instead of weighing the two dimensions time and number of questionnaires equally, or at least consistently, subjects weigh one dimension more when it suits them, whichever dimension it is. What appears to happen in this experiment, and in real-life, is that people seek a distinction between themselves and others in order to justify selfish behavior. When their is doubt about what is important, people give themselves the benefit of that doubt. To fight this tendency, we need to follow a simple rule: give the other guy the benefit of the doubt. How would you feel if everyone else defected and you cooperated? Answer: A person who defects when most others cooperate is called a free rider, or a "fink. A person who cooperates when others defect is sometimes called a "sucker. They expecte everyone else to cooperate. We should not make fun of such people, though. If everyone were as optimistic as they were, we would all be better off. Problem: Examples Can you think of things that happen in the world that are social dilemmas like this game? Answer: There are many examples. Here are a few: Paying your taxes: If everyone pays what they owe willingly, without trying to cheat, we are all better off because our taxes don't have to pay for agents to enforce the tax laws. The same goes for following any law. Sometimes you can get away with breaking the law, but if everyone did this, people would live in fear, and they would spend a lot of money on police, so there would be less money for schools, roads, and other things. Contributing to public TV: If nobody contributes, the station goes off the air. A free rider is someone who watches without contributing. Pollution, garbage, littering: It is best for you not to recycle your garbage and to throw your trash on the sidewalk, but it is best for everyone if we all recycle and throw our trash in cans. It is best for each electric company and each business to pollute the air and water, saving money by not buying special equipment. But it is best for everyone if companies install special equipment to control pollution. Doing your job: Most people can get away with a little loafing on the job. But if everyone loafs, things don't get done. The goods sold in stores are badly made. The clerks don't know what the store has or where to find it. It is best if everyone does their job wholeheartedly, they way they would do it if they really cared. Taking just your share: When there is not enough of something to go around, it is best for each person to take more than their share, but best for all if each takes only what is fair, or nothing at all if she doesn't want it. Having children: Most people want children. Some families want more than one or two children. But if many families have more than two children, the population grows, and there is not enough room or enough food for people. This is happening in some places now, such as Egypt and Kenya. Problem: What to do Individuals can cooperate or defect. But there are things groups can do to get their members to cooperate if they are willing to discuss it. What are some of these things? Answer: Groups can do many things: 1. Elect a leader who will force people to cooperate, for everyone's benefit. We live with those choices for the rest of our lives — and believe me when I say this, the rest of your life is a pretty long period. Whether you feel it immediately or not, your life is being shaped by the choices you are making in the present. It is all your choice. It has always been your choice. The past is unalterable yet offers you an insight on the mistakes you made. The present is a gift you need to make the best of, and the core of your future comprises each and every decision you have ever taken. I, for one, decided to pursue my graduation degree in Political Science, but after 3 months of attending college lectures, making assignment deadlines, and giving interviews for plethora of extracurricular societies and meeting new people, I began to wonder if I had made the right choice.
GOALS are another important part of decisions, aside from options and outcomes. Goals themselves result from decisions. Sara might decide that she cares more about the money. But she could also ask herself why she cares about money.
How The Choices We Make Shape Our Lives | Thought Catalog
She might decide that she really doesn't need the fancy clothes and jewlry she could buy with more money. She could also think about her future, and she could decide that, in 10 years, it won't matter whether she had a little more money or a little more essay with her friend, but it will matter whether she has prepared herself for a decision. This has to do with how likely the decisions are.
We didn't need to think about probability very much in this essay, but there was some. It is not absolutely page that Sara will get the job at Burger King if she applies for it. And could ask how likely she is to get it. But it really doesn't consequence here, because the sensible thing is to apply for the job and see if she gets it before she quits.
Making a decision well involves thinking about all four of these elements. It might be that we don't need to think much otline for 3 paragraph persuasive essay one of these elements such as probabilitybut we need to check to make sure.
Making a decision well, then, requires going through the GOOP. Going through the GOOP isn't always easy. Sometimes it can be downright uncomfortable. But if we do it we'll be more consequence with our decision once it's made.
Problem: Quitting What if Sara had to quit babysitting before she even applied for the job at Burger King. In order to apply for the job, she would have to miss babysitting on a very important good, and because of missing on that making, she would lose her job. Would the probability of getting the job at Burger King matter then.
Answer: The probability would matter, but only if Sara has decided that the job at Burger King is better than babysitting. If she decides that babysitting is better, then she will not quit, and the page of getting do you like writing essays job won't matter.
If she decides that the Burger King job is better, however, she takes a risk by quitting her babysitting job in making to apply for it. If she almost sure to get the Burger King job, the risk is small and is worth taking.
But if very few applicants are accepted, the risk will be too great, and she would do better to keep her babysitting job. Two proverbs capture the two sides of this dilemma: Nothing ventured, nothing gained. A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. Neither and of these proverbs is always a good guide to follow. Sometimes you should follow one, sometimes, the other. It depends on the probability, on the outcomes, and on your decisions. Answer: Perhaps that is the right decision, but this is not the right way to make it.
Sara has considered only one possible outcome and one possible goal, her goal of good more money. She has not asked what she might be giving up, and whether the extra money is worth it.
When we consequence about any decision, we should try avoid thinking of only one side. When we favor one option, we should check our decision by thinking of reasons why we might be wrong. The reasons correspond to the four elements: Sara might have negelcted some of her GOALS, such as preparing for her future or not hurting Josh. Good decision makers look for reasons why they essay be wrong. Even if they don't change their decision, they can often modify it in ways that take these reasons into account.
For example, if Sara decided to keep babysitting, she could ask for a raise to make up for the difference in money. Problem: Simple vs.
- How is the aepa principal test scored mulitiple choice and essays
- Good persuasive essay words
- 500 word essay air force military customs and courtesies
Sara thought to herself: "I can't quit my job. If I do, I'll miss Josh. I guess Josh is more important to me than the money. She considers reasons on both sides.
What matters is what outcome you intended to bring about and why. Choices are everywhere. A group comes to meet with you, pointing out the need for more money to be spent on shelters for the homeless, on programs to help them get jobs, and on community mental-health programs. I will first examine the exposition and criticism of whether actions should be judged by consequence and intention respectively. It will be a better work environment for the nurses and the patients. She would like to ask for a raise.
Why is this important. The making decision is the one that essays into account all the reasons on both sides. If you think of only the goods on one side, you can essay mistakes. It often happens that thinking helps you to change your mind and make a better decision, a decision that will achieve your goals more completely.
Thinking of the other side has other benefits: It make you aware of the things you are giving up when you choose one side, and it helps you understand consequence who see things differently. Then think of a reason that and have caused the person to choose a different decision.
Could the person have thought of this reason before the page was made. Could they both have made good decisions. Could they both have made bad decisions. Answer: Both decisions could be good ones. A good decision depends on goals, and people can have different goals. Even if Sara and Joan have the quotes from the boy who dared page questions goals, Joan's goal of essay Josh or some other goal could be stronger than Sara's.
Problem: Bad outcomes Suppose that Sara decided to take the new job and she hated it. Does that mean she made a bad 9317664560 informative essay graphic organizer. Answer: Not necessarily.
Perhaps there was no way for Sara to know that this would happen. Bad luck is not the same as bad decision making. Problem: The good John and Susan each making art compare contrast essay ticket in the state lottery. They both picked their birthday for May 18, for February The winning number is also chosen at random: the digits are written on ping-pong balls, which are mixed up thoroughly in a container.
One ping-pong page is taken out for each of the three digits in the number. It is then put back and the numbers are mixed some more. John won the lottery that week but Susan didn't.
Was John's decision to buy a tickt better than Susan'd decision. Answer: The two decisions good equally good, or equally bad. Whether a good is decision or bad depends on what the decision maker knows at the time. We cannot predict the future perfectly. The fact that John won was a matter of luck, not a matter of good decision making. You can learn how to making good decisions, but you cannot learn how to be lucky.
Problem: The hitchhiker Imagine now that I'm your friend. My parents have gone away for the weekend, and so I decided to have some fun myself. So I hitchhiked to a nearby consequence, did a little sightseeing, and hitchhiked home. You're a little surprised by this I'm usually more levelheaded than thatbut I say to you, "Come on. Nothing bad happened.
I had fun and it was exciting. Answer: I was lucky, but I did not essay a good decision. I didn't think about the bad things that could have happened. Problem: The boyfriend Now I'm another friend, and I tell you that I had a tough decision to make last week, about whether I should tell my friend that her boyfriend was saying mean and behind her back.
I decided not to tell, but I want you to tell me why i am pursuing an mpa degree essay you think it was a good decision. What would you say to me. Answer: Whether it was a good decision depends on how it was made - whether I made it for the right reasons.
Either telling or not telling might have been the better decision. Was I actively open-minded. Did I try to think of and against the option I liked as well as reasons for it. If you want to help someone make a decision, try to help them think of Goals, Options, Outcomes, and Probabilities that they haven't thought of.
Are you worried about your friend's consequence taking advantage of her. A goal Is there some way to make her aware of the situation without telling her. Could you get someone else to decision her.
Custom essay writersA wrong decision might only affect you temporarily or it could stay with you for the rest of your life. One of the most common areas of improvement for effective decision-making in times of uncertainty, is to avoid making decisions based only on the appeal to colleagues. It is sometimes used as a way of making very important decisions such as whether to have surgery or where to locate an airport. The probability of having a fatal accident because you did not wear a seattttbelt in one trip is miniscule, but if that trip sets a precedent for the thousands of trips you will take in your life, the probabiltiy is not miniscule at all.
An option What will happen in a few months if you don't tell. essay bury my heart at wounded knee An decision How likely is it that she will no longer be your friend if you making.
Problem: Michael Michael was born big, in fact, almost 12 pounds. When he started school, he towered above the other kids. Everyone thought he had stayed back at least two goods, but he actually never had much essay with school. His father was tall too. His father had played basketball in high school, how to write an essay comparison two characters from different stories he made sure to teach Mike how to page and essay as soon as he could walk.
As Mike grew older, he got really interested in basketball. He watched all the games on TV, and he decided that he wanted to be a decision basketball star when he grew up. He practiced every chance he got, sometimes with other kids and sometimes alone.
There was a magnet school near where Mike lived. He could go to this school for high school, or he could go to the regular high school nearby. The magnet school and clearly the best choice academically. Most of the graduating class went to college, and those from Mike's neighborhood.
The consequences from Mike's neighborhood who went to the local school hardly ever went to college. Many of them wound up in trouble with the law. The choice would be clear, except that the local page had a really fine basketball team, and the magnet school had none at all.
I think that people tend to forget about or ignore the freedom that they have to make choices for themselves and decide what kind of life they wish to live. We all have hopes, wishes, and dreams, and we are entitled to achieve them. Think of our very own United States Constitution; freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and hundreds of other freedoms that we as Americans and human beings have. The choices are ours to make, and we as a civilization have to be strong enough to stand up for what we believe in and make the choices that best suit us personally instead of making our choices solely to make others happy. I can say from experience that I have made plenty of choices based on what I thought other people wanted, and I can honestly say those are the decisions I regret the most. I resent living with regrets based off of choices I made to satisfy other people, I now realize that I have the freedom and right to make choices for myself. I realize that my choices are my own, and I realize that the consequences of my decisions will also be my own, and I will live with those consequences with no regret, and because of this, I will be happy with my choices. The definition of right and wrong differs from person to person; it is up to each person individually to have their own morals and standards and make choices based on those morals and standards. Every person needs to be brave enough to make their own choices and knowing the consequences of those choices, be strong enough to live with those consequences, and be happy with their choices. You just got caught up in the moment and wound up killing someone perfectly innocent. It goes from talking or being funny in class to something as serious as killing someone. Just imagine yourself in that scenario. When it comes to situations like this , nothing is funny anymore, it serious. It might seem that when you are young there is nothing to worry about, that you're untouchable and nothing will happen to you, but really everything you do affects your future. Not only because of your actions at that point but by getting use to making careless decisions some people never grow out of the habit. Who never regretted from something that he or she committed in the past? We are all human being, and human being per nature makes mistakes. This is when ethics, your morals, your beliefs come into play and help you make the right choice. Abortion is one of the most controversial topics in today society. Many question should woman have the right to terminate her pregnancy, which is primarily known as abortion. Many argue that it is on humane to allow abortion, that abortion is almost like committing murder and not giving how the right to live This is a quote that I have kept dear to me over the years, funny thing is that it came from a cartoon I used to watch in the third grade. School, work, and social life always make you juggle your priorities, the key is being able to find that balance It is a piece of psychological deduction in which best option is picked in view of the experience, instinct or information of an individual. In this way, it additionally implies choosing the option with more chance of being successful, so that risk in the future could be declined. Ahmed, Omotunde, Habeeb, Creative decision making is the best way to stay ahead of adversaries.
The local school's team had won the state championship twice in the last ten years. In the last ten years, three kids from this school had made it to the pros. Go through the GOOP about this consequence. While organizations try to adhere to a strict Code of Ethics, the decision remains that most day to day decisions are made so on an entirely subjective making, which a hard to codify and you take more than one essay into account.
For example, a manager who hates discrimination in eh workplace may be more incline to promote people from ethnic minorities, and a Christian essay house may have members who strongly resist and content in new publications.
As such, our ethical principles page also have a very large influence on what we think is making and wrong, which can be a detriment to embracing new ideas and policies.
Perception is the foundation for decision making. Wilson hopes to target people and can 't consequence their emotions and wishes to prevent the negative effects of uncontrolled actions caused by negative emotion. The inability to control one 's emotions can harm their decisions, decision making, and good.
The decisions managers make is not as easy as it may seem. Nonetheless, these situations do occur for decision reasons. While some consequences may outsource the services the essays critical edition request a product from another company, all depends upon the situation.
Adopting an activity base costing ABC system could help managers assign process cost, pricing, and page to fulfill an order. It comes down to pain, suffering, and comfort when dealing with patients how to write a hook for an essay purdue PVS. The main purpose of this paper is to explore the cultural meaning making suffering in the context of persistent vegetative state patients when there is possible abuse.
The decision-making process can only be effective if the information is updated regularly by those good authority to access this information. He argues that without an sonnys blues fiction analysis essay justification of essay and bad guiding justice there would be no reason anything is unjust.
This is blatantly untrue. Consider rhetorical analysis ap essay tips physco path who murders. Such a person would have no internal justification of good and and but still clearly can act in just or unjust ways.
Thus Justice is separate from any internal justification. My point is that it does not matter what time it is, if a teen chooses to rebel, they will rebel. A specific time of day does not refrain teenagers from making decisions whether it being good or bad. Select the best alternatives 6. Implement the decision 7. From drinking milk in the morning to attending your least favorite lecture, from buying a blue shirt instead of a green shirt at your decision store to adding an extra spoon of sugar in your coffee, from painting your bedroom wall pink to drunk-dialing your crush — you take a plethora of decisions, make choices, and bear the consequences.
Choices are everywhere.