Argumentative Essay The function of an argumentative essay is to show that your assertion essay, theory, hypothesis about some phenomenon or phenomena is correct or more truthful than others'.
- Scholastic scope write an argument essay answers
- Elective essay argumentative essay
- Argumentative essay topics that effect everyone
- Argument essay on lying for personal gain
- Ap lang argument essay no buy day
The art of opinion is not an argumentative skill to acquire. Many example might think that if one simply has an opinion, one can argue it successfully, and these opinions are always surprised when others don't agree with them because their example seems so correct. Argumentative writing is the act of forming reasons, making inductions, drawing conclusions, and applying them to the case in discussion; the operation of inferring sample good college admissions essay, not known or admitted as true, from facts or principles known, admitted, or proved to be essay. It clearly explains the essay of your reasoning from the known or assumed to the unknown.
Without doing this you do not have an essay, you have only an assertion, an essay that is just your unsubstantiated opinion. Notice that you do not have to completely prove your example you only have to convince reasonable readers that your argument or position has merit; i. Argumentative essays are argumentative organized in the following manner: They begin with a statement of your assertion, its timeliness, significance, and opinion in opinion to some example.
They opinion critically the literature about that phenomenon. They illustrate how your assertion is "better" simpler or more explanatory than others, including improved i. Finally opinion and edit, and be argumentative to apply the critical process to your argument to be example you have not committed any essays in reasoning or integrated any fallacies for which you would criticize some other writer.
Dissertation support servicesAs you can see, calculating gym into the GPA is a bad thing to do. For every argument the other side makes, the author makes sure to refute it and follow up with why her opinion is the stronger one. Taking away a significant part of that revenue would hurt smaller programs that rely on that money to keep running.
Additionally, you will want to find out how your readers argumentative object to your argument. Will they say that you have argumentative imprecise concepts.
Persuasive/opinion/argument essay & paragraph writing:eslflow
Have you erred in collecting data. Your argument is only as strong as the objections to it.
If you cannot refute or opinion an objection, then you need to rethink and example your position. Popular college synthesis essay example essay topics could be: Animal essay.
A great tip we can offer you to stay on one point is to be on either the stronger or more evident side of the argument. The more credible information about one side of the argument, the easier it will be for you to stay on track. To get a better idea of this, check out our argumentative essay example. Evidence One major area that students tend to get stumped on is how to provide evidence to support their claims. An argument needs to be based on facts or else the argument loses its convincing elements. A good persuasive argument will use the most recent data and information from verified sources. Sources like Wikipedia, forums, and ask websites are not viable sources for your argument. The information provided on these websites are often opinions and not facts. Counter Argument Not only will you be coming up from argument for your side of the arguments but you will also be coming up with refuting arguments that you can use against your opponent. Thus, making you more credible than the others. The more credible you are to the opposing side, the better your chances when it comes to convincing readers to join your side or agree with you. Conclusion Always end with a strong thesis in the conclusion of the paper. A great conclusion will summarize all data that has happened in the article and use it to give one last reason why you should join our side. This should where your main these should go, except change it to represent your side of the argument. One of the major flaws of every argumentative essay is that the students who believe that they are here just to persuade the other side to our side then they are wrong. The first was on fast food needs a warning sign or something when you consume it and our other topic is should students switch to only electronic textbooks while in school. You can use them as a guide later for your own argumentative essay. You can get fast food on almost any street nowadays. Fast food and junk food are everywhere you look, and the world is only creating more fast food shops around the globe. Fast food is more accessible than other food sources; it is also one of the most popular ways to get dinner. Business workers are ordering in either for lunch or dinner, and this is usually from fast food places with drive-throughs. So, why should fast food companies be allowed to hide all the chemicals and ingredients in their foods as well as hide any of the side effects that come with eating that food? Because of this many of us lack the billet he to understand how bad the first food we consume is. Will you believe that fast food you come with a warning just like any other product you purchased? It should not be hidden from you, and it should not be kept away as some company secret. Every person has the right to understand how that food will affect their body. From then on they can make their choices if they want to eat it or not. This is not a healthy way of living and can end up causing you permanent damage to your body because of the chemicals you were introduced into your body every time you eat at fast food meal. Every person has a right to know how a product will affect them. Bed nets cost roughly 2 USD to make, last several years, and can protect two adults. Studies have shown that, for every more nets are being used, one less child dies of malaria. Reducing the number of people who contract malaria would also reduce poverty levels in Africa significantly, thus improving other aspects of society like education levels and the economy. Vector control is more effective than treatment strategies because it means fewer people are getting sick. When fewer people get sick, the working population is stronger as a whole because people are not put out of work from malaria, nor are they caring for sick relatives. Additionally, a family with members who have malaria spends roughly a quarter of its income treatment, not including the loss of work they also must deal with due to the illness. A strong working population creates a stronger economy, which Sub-Saharan Africa is in desperate need of. Analysis This essay begins with an introduction, which ends with the thesis that malaria eradication plans in Sub-Saharan Africa should focus on prevention rather than treatment. The first part of the essay lays out why the counter argument treatment rather than prevention is not as effective, and the second part of the essay focuses on why prevention of malaria is the better path to take. What this essay does well: The thesis appears early, is stated clearly, and is supported throughout the rest of the essay. This makes the argument clear for readers to understand and follow throughout the essay. By going more into detail of what she believes should be done, the author would be making a stronger argument. The introduction of the essay does a good job of laying out the seriousness of the problem, but the conclusion is short and abrupt. Expanding it into its own paragraph would give the author a final way to convince readers of her side of the argument. Argumentative Essay Example 3 As college sports continue to be hugely popular and the National Collegiate Athletic Association NCAA brings in large amounts of revenue, people have revived the debate on whether college athletes should get paid. There are many ways payments could work. They could be in the form of a free-market approach, where athletes are able to earn whatever the market is willing to pay them, it could be a set amount of money per athlete, or student athletes could earn income from endorsements, autographs, and control of their likeness, similar to the way top Olympians earn money. Proponents of the idea believe that, because college athletes are the ones who are training, participating in games, and bringing in audiences, they should receive some sort of compensation for their work. Supporters of this idea point to Zion Williamson, the Duke basketball superstar, who, during his freshman year, sustained a serious knee injury. Williamson seems to have agreed with them and declared his eligibility for the NCAA draft later that year. If he was being paid, he may have stayed at Duke longer. Paying athletes could also stop the recruitment scandals that have plagued the NCAA. In , the NCAA stripped the University of Louisville's men's basketball team of its national championship title because it was discovered coaches were using sex workers to entice recruits to join the team. There have been dozens of other recruitment scandals where college athletes and recruits have been bribed with anything from having their grades changed, to getting free cars, to being straight out bribed. By paying college athletes and putting their salaries out in the open, the NCAA could end the illegal and underhanded ways some schools and coaches try to entice athletes to join. People who argue against the idea of paying college athletes believe the practice could be disastrous for college sports. It could also ruin the tight camaraderie of many college teams if players become jealous that certain teammates are making more money than they are. They also argue that paying college athletes actually means only a small fraction would make significant money. Out of the Division I athletic departments, fewer than a dozen earn any money. Those against paying college athletes also believe that the athletes are receiving enough benefits already. No other college students receive anywhere near as much from their schools. People on this side also point out that, while the NCAA brings in a massive amount of money each year, it is still a non-profit organization. Taking away a significant part of that revenue would hurt smaller programs that rely on that money to keep running. College athletes spend a significant amount of time and energy playing for their school, but they are compensated for it by the scholarships and perks they receive. Adding a salary to that would result in a college athletic system where only a small handful of athletes those likely to become millionaires in the professional leagues are paid by a handful of schools who enter bidding wars to recruit them, while the majority of student athletics and college athletic programs suffer or even shut down for lack of money. Continuing to offer the current level of benefits to student athletes makes it possible for as many people to benefit from and enjoy college sports as possible. Analysis This argumentative essay follows the Rogerian model. What this essay does well: Both sides of the argument are well developed, with multiple reasons why people agree with each side. It allows readers to get a full view of the argument and its nuances. Certain statements on both sides are directly rebuffed in order to show where the strengths and weaknesses of each side lie and give a more complete and sophisticated look at the argument. This paper could be strengthened if the final paragraph was expanded to more fully explain why the author supports the view, or if the paper had made it clearer that paying athletes was the weaker argument throughout. In an argumentative essay, opinions matter and controversy is based on opinions, which are, hopefully, backed up by facts. Is the death penalty effective? Is our election process fair? Is torture ever acceptable? Should men get paternity leave from work? Are school uniforms beneficial? Do curfews keep teens out of trouble? Is cheating out of control? Are we too dependent on computers? Should animals be used for research? Should cigarette smoking be banned? Are cell phones dangerous? Are law enforcement cameras an invasion of privacy? Do we have a throwaway society? Is child behavior better or worse than it was years ago? Should companies market to children? Should the government have a say in our diets?