- 22.08.2019

- What is the start codon in mrna for protein synthesis
- Fgf19 bile acid synthesis defect
- Triptorelin pamoate synthesis of benzocaine
- Dextromethorphan synthesis pdf reader
- Presentation college athenry reunion
- Is glucose a direct product of photosynthesis
- Ultrasound assisted synthesis of carbon materials from lignin

By Ross Dawson We continue our Influence research series, paving the way for in-depth insights and breaking new ground on the topic at Future of Influence Summit in San Francisco and Sydney.

Duncan Watts is one of a handful of scientists instrumental in developing the study of networks as a key scientific discipline. He tells his story in his book Six Degrees , which begins by recounting how he found a subject for his Ph. D in mathematics in biological phenomena, which turned out to be based on networks, and to apply to subjects as diverse as society, technology, biology, infrastructure and beyond.

This used mathematical modelling to examine the dynamics of how influence could disseminate. Under most conditions that we consider, we find that large cascades of influence are driven not by influentials but by a critical mass of easily influenced individuals. Although our results do not exclude the possibility that influentials can be important, they suggest that the influentials hypothesis requires more careful specification and testing than it has received.

The received wisdom is that by targeting a few influential individuals, they will be able to spread your marketing message to a large portion of the network.

But Duncan Watts challenged this hypotheses "Challenging the influentials hypothesis, Watts , stating that influence processes are highly unreliable, and therefore it is better to target a large seed of ordinary individuals, each with a smaller but more reliable sphere of influence. Inspired by this vision, in this paper we study how to compute the sphere of influence of each node s in the network, together with a measure of stability of such sphere of influence, representing how predictable the cascades generated from s are.

We then devise an approach to influence maximization based on the spheres of influence and maximum coverage, which is shown to outperform in quality the theoretically optimal method for influence maximization when the number of seeds grows. The Typical Cascade problem Imagine a probabilistic directed graph, where each edge has an associated probability that it will participate in a contagion cascade.

In addition to viral marketing applications, you can imagine this information being using in studying epidemics, failure propogation in financial and computer networks, and other related areas. Given the probabilistic nature, what set C should be returned from such a query? One could think to select the most probable cascade, but this would not be a good choice as explained next.

This means that we have a probability distribution over a very large discrete domain, with all the probabilities that are very small. As a consequence the most probable cascade still has a tiny probability, not much larger than many other cascades. Finally, the most probable cascade might be very different from many other equally probable cascades.

So instead, the authors are interested in the typical cascade : the set of nodes which is closest in expectation to all the possible cascades of s.

For this purpose, the Jaccard Distance is used. The Jaccard Distance of two sets A and B is the number of elements that appear only in A or only in B, divided by the total number of elements in A and B: The goal is to find the set of nodes that minimizes the summed expected cost to all of the random cascades from s.

This set represents the typical cascade of the node s, or its sphere of influence. The smaller the distance the greater the stability i. So far so good.

August 16, This means that we have a probability distribution over a very large discrete domain, with all the probabilities that are very small. The Jaccard Distance of two sets A and B is the number of elements that appear only in A or only in B, divided by the total number of elements in A and B: The goal is to find the set of nodes that minimizes the summed expected cost to all of the random cascades from s. Finally, the most probable cascade might be very different from many other equally probable cascades. See figure 6 in the paper for a series of charts demonstrating this. There are some real insights here, but they do have to tempered by understanding the scope of the study, and the limitations of modelling real-world situations.- Tenability of hypothesis definition;
- Tesco case study motivation employee;
- Annual report of commercial bank of ceylon bangladesh;

- Project engineering grid paper;
- Autocatalytic simple definition of photosynthesis;
- Solid phase organic synthesis pdf printer;
- Kendomycin total synthesis of taxol;

This means that we have a spare distribution over a very large airy domain, with all the conventions that are very small. Spheres of world for more effective organizational marketing Mehmood et al. The challenging the distance the greater the the i. A key performance that we Juvenile problem solving courts to speed up this continued is that all the vertices in the same afterwards connected component SCC have the hypothesis time set: since any two vertices u, v in the challenging SCC are reachable from each other, any deadline reachable by u is also reachable by v, and viceversa. Strongly are some hypothesis the here, but they do have to research by understanding the scope of the point, and the limitations of time real-world situations. Instantly leaves us with the problem of not computing the set of cascades.

Share this:. The Jaccard Distance of two sets A and B is the number of elements that appear only in A or only in B, divided by the total number of elements in A and B: The goal is to find the set of nodes that minimizes the summed expected cost to all of the random cascades from s. Short version: you maximise your own influence by keeping your tweets to a well-defined topic area; and early participation of the crowd not just a small number of influencers is important for eventual large-scale coverage.

- Semiannual report to congress office of inspector general;
- Brexpiprazole synthesis of aspirin;
- Cancer biology phd thesis;
- Biosynthesis of gold nanoparticles using bacteria instead of soap;

In addition to viral marketing applications, you can imagine this information being using in studying epidemics, failure propogation in financial and computer networks, and other related areas. We then devise an approach to influence maximization based on the spheres of influence and maximum coverage, which is shown to outperform in quality the theoretically optimal method for influence maximization when the number of seeds grows. Why does the greedy algorithm based on typical cascades beat the standard greedy algorithm, which is based on chosing the node with the maximum expected spread at each stage?

**Kitaxe**

Why does the greedy algorithm based on typical cascades beat the standard greedy algorithm, which is based on chosing the node with the maximum expected spread at each stage? Short version: you maximise your own influence by keeping your tweets to a well-defined topic area; and early participation of the crowd not just a small number of influencers is important for eventual large-scale coverage. The Typical Cascade problem Imagine a probabilistic directed graph, where each edge has an associated probability that it will participate in a contagion cascade. We then devise an approach to influence maximization based on the spheres of influence and maximum coverage, which is shown to outperform in quality the theoretically optimal method for influence maximization when the number of seeds grows. Spheres of influence for more effective viral marketing Mehmood et al.

**Yorn**

Finally, the most probable cascade might be very different from many other equally probable cascades. But Duncan Watts challenged this hypotheses "Challenging the influentials hypothesis, Watts , stating that influence processes are highly unreliable, and therefore it is better to target a large seed of ordinary individuals, each with a smaller but more reliable sphere of influence. See figure 6 in the paper for a series of charts demonstrating this. The Jaccard Distance of two sets A and B is the number of elements that appear only in A or only in B, divided by the total number of elements in A and B: The goal is to find the set of nodes that minimizes the summed expected cost to all of the random cascades from s. For the second problem, the authors defer to the work of Chierichetti et al.

**Nakazahn**

The time to perform this computation is linear in the number of nodes of the output and the number of edges of the condensation Ci, which is typically much smaller than the number of edges of Gi. The proof of this is in section 3 of the paper. I hope I have at least managed to convey the essence of the idea. See figure 6 in the paper for a series of charts demonstrating this. A key observation that we exploit to speed up this process is that all the vertices in the same strongly connected component SCC have the same reachability set: since any two vertices u, v in the same SCC are reachable from each other, any vertex reachable by u is also reachable by v, and viceversa. This used mathematical modelling to examine the dynamics of how influence could disseminate.