Most people are spoon-fed by the mainstream media that guns contribute to higher crime rates. The Second Amendment states,"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. They can 't find work, increasing inflation rates, an unstable budget, and more importantly, a problem with guns.
Like everyone else living in rough environments, I am cautious about being the victim of a random shooting, but at the same time, I want to be able to protect my family at all costs no matter the situation.
Guns affect each and every one of us on a day-to-day base. Guns serve for a variety of purposes that range from good to bad. Guns are not for everyone. This paper will explore the alternative interpretations of the Second Amendment and its role in American history. Next, the reality of homicide as it relates to gun control will be considered. Finally, the positive and negative effects of gun-control policies will be scrutinized.
The recent shootings at Newtown, CT and Orlando, FL have indicated the urgent need for stricter regulation that will make it more difficult for citizens to possess a firearm. It is important to realize that different time periods mean different political atmospheres.
The idea of a union of sovereign states was new and potentially dangerous. Though the fear of state militias was relevant in the eighteenth century, this fear is unnecessary today. The mention of a militia suggests a military force from a civil population. This clarifies that the Second Amendment is predicated on groups, not individuals. The reason this amendment centers on groups is because at this point in history, the threat of a standing army was extremely prevalent.
This rebellion, however, would not have enjoyed constitutional protection. The Framers would have most likely viewed this as an armed mob, which as mentioned before, is decided to be very different than a well regulated militia, which would be under constitutional protection.
This rebellion also demonstrated the danger guns and armed groups acting without governmental authority could pose. Therefore, the Framers decided it was necessary to differentiate between an armed mob and a militia. Only second to tyranny, anarchy was the reality they feared most. The contemporary understanding has become radically different. Overall, every right is apt to reasonable regulation, including gun rights. However, the opposing argument of gun rights has also used the Second Amendment as a reason for unregulated gun ownership.
Gun rights proponents view gun control policies as an attack on the Second Amendment. Supreme Court decisions such as the case of Printz vs U.
The Brady Bill was passed in and required local chief law enforcement officers to perform background checks. These background checks were to be performed in prospective handgun purchasers, until the Attorney General establishes a federal system for this purpose. County Sheriff Printz challenged whether this bill was constitutional on behalf of the local chief law enforcement officers in Montana and Arizona. Using the Necessary and Proper Clause of Article 1 of the Constitution, Congress tried to enact this form of regulation.
The District Court found this bill to be unconstitutional, therefore strengthening the gun rights argument. The Court argued that state legislatures are not subject to federal direction, capitalizing on the fact that the Brady Bill could not require local chief law enforcement officers to perform these tasks.
Therefore, state legislatures did not have to enforce these checks and citizens could own firearms as a right. United States. The first is that gun ownership is a God-given right. Gun rights activists believe that owning a firearm is a right that each individual can exercise, according to his or her own conscience.
This enforces the statement that people are the problems, not guns. This can be traced back to slavery in American history.
In the early stages of our country, judges in the South thought that every white man should have a gun because they were in constant fear of a slave insurrection. From horrifying mass shootings to suicide, guns only encourage homicidal behavior and violence.
Therefore, we must now explore the arguments centered around gun violence. According to the Centers for Disease Control in , approximately 30, people die each year through homicides, suicides, and accidents in the United States at the hand of a gun.
Moreover, almost a third of gun deaths are the result of suicide. Lanza et al. However, this has been refuted. On December 14th, , hours before the shooting at Newtown, Connecticut, a deranged Chinese man walked into an elementary school and indiscriminately attacked everyone around him, hitting 22 children using a knife.
The use of a knife is significant because if a gun would have been used, the children in the school could have been killed and not just injured. Effective gun control laws in China prevented this man from obtaining a gun. Undoubtedly, a gun would have inflicted much more damage. Ultimately, this event demonstrates that guns can make killings easier. Therefore is it unsurprising that in , handguns killed 10, people in the U. Banning all guns in America would make things much more simple at a legal point of view — a shooter is found guilty simply because they own or had a firearm.
Passing such a law would prove impossible. Millions of Americans would revolt against the government — some say a ban like this could cause a second Civil War. Many Americans love their guns, and even the government knows that the confiscation of guns across America would cause total pandemonium.
Concluded with arguments against gun control constitution to prepare research papers. Compare and contrast gun control essay. Though the fear of state militias was relevant in the eighteenth century, this fear is unnecessary today. Once you are familiar with these, you can say that you are familiar with the historical background of the issue. Going into this topic, I was assuming that I would end up reading about a lot of school shootings and how it is just guns that are causing Is Gun Control The Answer? Opposing sides have for years fought over the laws that govern firearms.
Previous to when this act was passed, consumers only had to sign a statement that they were over twenty-one years of age for a handgun. The three most critical gun control policies put forth are universal background checks, a ban on high-capacity magazines, and a ban on certain assault weapons. It will also require the private sale of a gun be done through a dealer and then require the waiting period. The main body is where you present both sides of the argument and your opinion on the issue along with an explanation of why you stand in favor of this particular opinion.
As a concerned resident of the state, I am motivated to bring to the attention of our law enforcers, that stricter laws on firearms should be enforced. Should anybody have Guns? Therefore so many people thinking about to buys guns and to have guns at home. This means that you should focus on the research data that already exists in a given field rather than on opinions, including your own.
Besides, to write an excellent argumentative essay, you need a solid understanding of both "your" argument and the opposing one. As for the pre-writing and writing process, a persuasive essay will indeed be very similar to an argumentative one: you pick a polarizing topic and pick a side in the discussion, you conduct an extensive research of both viewpoints to gain the understanding of the opposing side to which you are to appeal, and then you proceed with the same steps that we have described earlier. However this act also states that other firearm use is not legitimate. Gun control advocates argue on behalf of safety.
However, the journalists are able to find a number of loopholes in the existing regulations, and they conclude that the regulations need to be even more strict. This tragedy caused pandemonium, ignited the debate for gun control to new heights, and incited a call for a new law. In several decades in the future, when this policy has decreased the circulation of high-capacity magazines, there is a strong potential for a decrease in mass murders. Because this act does not specify limits on ammunition, other measure have been necessary. Among gun control advocates, a ban on high-capacity magazines is favored because this can reduce the number of shots available in the case of a mass shooting, therefore possible gun deaths. Notably, this choice will not always be up to you.
Expository gun control essay. There are millions of guns throughout the United States. In order to keep firearms such as an AK out of the hands of everyday citizens, new and tighter policies need to be enacted. A definition essay is basically a more expanded version of a dictionary article. The efforts are made in wake of a real threat to the lives of many people and also to control illegal activities like terrorism, robberies and killings. Even if the actual sale is prohibited, the transfer of the gun cannot be regulated.
So, you should also be well-informed about what experts have to say on the issue from both sides of the argument. Finally, the positive and negative effects of gun-control policies will be scrutinized. Gun control had been a phenomenal issue in our country.